Faithful followers,
I've decided I'm not much of a blogger. Just can't seem to post on a regular basis. Guess I'd rather be training and talking to my friends/clients face-to-face.
This blog is hereby retired.
Rick
Sunday, January 16, 2011
Friday, June 11, 2010
Primitive Running 6 - The Weakest Link
So I've been running in the new style for quite a while now... about 9 months, and the forefoot strike is starting to feel pretty normal now. That's not to say there aren't challenges though.
There are, for example, my hamstrings. When I push myself either in terms of altering technique or pushing my physical fitness limits, breakdowns occur wherever my weakest link is. In the beginning of the primitive running adventure it was my calves. Those were shored up with healthy doses of practice and strength training, but now I've discovered my next weakest link, the hammys.
When I start a run I immediately feel stiffness and discomfort in the upper hamstrings of both legs. This makes it hard to get going, but once I'm warmed up things usually go well. When I'm done my post-workout soreness is concentrated in that area as well. So the current plan is to make sure I do at least 2 days per week of leg curls and other lower body strength moves, as well as stretching, to hopefully repair that weakest link.
In other news, I've attempted my first race since adopting the new running style. I have to admit that I could not maintain what I thought was perfect technique. The race was a 5k, and 5ks tend to be exhausting right from the starting gun. I wasn't able to stay on my forefoot the whole time, but when I had the capacity to think of it I would try my best.
I think this may mean one of two things: either I'm over-exaggerating the technique during my training or the new technique is hard to maintain when I'm racing at or above threshold. Either way I think I'm going to proceed as planned and stick with the new style. I know that expertise in any particular discipline takes several years to acquire, so I'm not discouraged. I still do all my training avoiding a heel strike and I still plan to try to run my races that way.
On yet another note, two of my friends/training partners have taken barefoot running to heart and have nothing but good things to say about it, aside from the initial calf soreness that everyone seems to get. One of these runners was mentioned in a previous post having initially proclaimed barefoot running the worst idea ever. I think the lesson here is that, although the technique is difficult to adopt in the beginning, it has long-term benefits that are worth the initial struggle.
There are, for example, my hamstrings. When I push myself either in terms of altering technique or pushing my physical fitness limits, breakdowns occur wherever my weakest link is. In the beginning of the primitive running adventure it was my calves. Those were shored up with healthy doses of practice and strength training, but now I've discovered my next weakest link, the hammys.
When I start a run I immediately feel stiffness and discomfort in the upper hamstrings of both legs. This makes it hard to get going, but once I'm warmed up things usually go well. When I'm done my post-workout soreness is concentrated in that area as well. So the current plan is to make sure I do at least 2 days per week of leg curls and other lower body strength moves, as well as stretching, to hopefully repair that weakest link.
In other news, I've attempted my first race since adopting the new running style. I have to admit that I could not maintain what I thought was perfect technique. The race was a 5k, and 5ks tend to be exhausting right from the starting gun. I wasn't able to stay on my forefoot the whole time, but when I had the capacity to think of it I would try my best.
I think this may mean one of two things: either I'm over-exaggerating the technique during my training or the new technique is hard to maintain when I'm racing at or above threshold. Either way I think I'm going to proceed as planned and stick with the new style. I know that expertise in any particular discipline takes several years to acquire, so I'm not discouraged. I still do all my training avoiding a heel strike and I still plan to try to run my races that way.
On yet another note, two of my friends/training partners have taken barefoot running to heart and have nothing but good things to say about it, aside from the initial calf soreness that everyone seems to get. One of these runners was mentioned in a previous post having initially proclaimed barefoot running the worst idea ever. I think the lesson here is that, although the technique is difficult to adopt in the beginning, it has long-term benefits that are worth the initial struggle.
Monday, February 1, 2010
Primitive Running 5 - Why call it primitive running?
But first a quick update. My weight is steady at around 205 pounds. Think I need to work more on good nutrition and tip the calorie balance in favor of weight loss before this side of things improves. Nonetheless my feet and legs are getting stronger with each day that I run with the forefoot strike. In fact, last Friday I managed a 90 minute run forefoot striking the entire time. Yes, at times it was uncomfortable, but my arches/calves/hamstrings never reached the point of failure. I feel I could easily do a 5k race with this technique now and I'm looking forward to the summer season!
That said, there are still some physical issues, specifically upper hamstring tightness and occasional pain in the arches (no calf DOMS though!). These are minor however, and getting better with each passing day. I think my neuromuscular system has completely assimilated the new technique because reverting to the old heel strike feels very awkward. Only during downhill running to I sometimes land on my heels, and that may be partially due to the slippery, snow-covered roads.
So, why do I call it primitive running anyway? Running with a forefoot/midfoot strike is a totally mainstream and contemporary technique. Pretty much any pro runner worth their salt does it. It's preached by every running/triathlon coach I've ever heard from. So why don't I just call it "good form"?
Well, there are two reasons. The first is that I was convinced of the validity of the technique after reading about the Tarahumara in "Born to Run". Second, I guess there is more I'd like to achieve than just good running form. I'd like to experience running in a way that primitive humans did. It seems to me that we're wired to enjoy doing the things that are required of us to survive in this world and pass on our genes to the next generation. Examples: eating... fun, sex... fun, being warm and safe instead of cold and exposed... fun. In the days before a paycheck and a phone call to Pizza Hut were the only things required to get food, presumably running (or at least walking a lot) was a requirement for survival. And if our brains were not wired to perceive running as fun, we'd be less likely to do it and less likely to acquire food. So you may say this is pure speculation and ask, "how could anyone think running is fun?" Well, many adults claim to enjoy running, but rather than use them as evidence, I'll point to children. Left without any video game type distractions kids will run nonstop for hours at a time. They'll run until they pass out. Put them on a playground or just them amongst some trees and rocks and hills and streams and fields and they'll find a reason to run. So do we lose this desire to run when we become adults? I think not, but it is repressed in our modern world. So instead of running for the pure joy or the necessity of finding food, we begrudgingly do it to "stay fit" or "lose weight", but most people don't seem to enjoy it.
I didn't enjoy running when I first started. And I'm only starting to as I get better at it and it becomes more and more effortless. So I suppose there is some activation energy to overcome before running can be a true joy for the modern, hard-working grown-up, but I'd like to think it's worth it. I really do like running, but I think I could like it even more. When I begin deciding that I truly, truly WANT to run on a daily basis, that's when I'll call myself a primitive runner.
That said, there are still some physical issues, specifically upper hamstring tightness and occasional pain in the arches (no calf DOMS though!). These are minor however, and getting better with each passing day. I think my neuromuscular system has completely assimilated the new technique because reverting to the old heel strike feels very awkward. Only during downhill running to I sometimes land on my heels, and that may be partially due to the slippery, snow-covered roads.
So, why do I call it primitive running anyway? Running with a forefoot/midfoot strike is a totally mainstream and contemporary technique. Pretty much any pro runner worth their salt does it. It's preached by every running/triathlon coach I've ever heard from. So why don't I just call it "good form"?
Well, there are two reasons. The first is that I was convinced of the validity of the technique after reading about the Tarahumara in "Born to Run". Second, I guess there is more I'd like to achieve than just good running form. I'd like to experience running in a way that primitive humans did. It seems to me that we're wired to enjoy doing the things that are required of us to survive in this world and pass on our genes to the next generation. Examples: eating... fun, sex... fun, being warm and safe instead of cold and exposed... fun. In the days before a paycheck and a phone call to Pizza Hut were the only things required to get food, presumably running (or at least walking a lot) was a requirement for survival. And if our brains were not wired to perceive running as fun, we'd be less likely to do it and less likely to acquire food. So you may say this is pure speculation and ask, "how could anyone think running is fun?" Well, many adults claim to enjoy running, but rather than use them as evidence, I'll point to children. Left without any video game type distractions kids will run nonstop for hours at a time. They'll run until they pass out. Put them on a playground or just them amongst some trees and rocks and hills and streams and fields and they'll find a reason to run. So do we lose this desire to run when we become adults? I think not, but it is repressed in our modern world. So instead of running for the pure joy or the necessity of finding food, we begrudgingly do it to "stay fit" or "lose weight", but most people don't seem to enjoy it.
I didn't enjoy running when I first started. And I'm only starting to as I get better at it and it becomes more and more effortless. So I suppose there is some activation energy to overcome before running can be a true joy for the modern, hard-working grown-up, but I'd like to think it's worth it. I really do like running, but I think I could like it even more. When I begin deciding that I truly, truly WANT to run on a daily basis, that's when I'll call myself a primitive runner.
Tuesday, December 15, 2009
Primitive Running 4 - Quick Update
Ran a track workout with the group again this Monday and the new running form is feeling less and less awkward. Still a little tightness in my calf from the skipping incident, but well enough to workout if I don't push it.
I ran some 200s, 400s, 800s and strides with one of my star athletes and was able to maintain a forefoot strike the entire time. The things that have been bothering me the most since beginning this attempt to change my form have been a sore left forefoot, sore/fatigued calves and tightness in my upper left hamstring. I still feel the tightness in my hammy, but I think my calves are adapting nicely. I don't really get super DOMS (delayed onset muscle soreness) any more, but it's still a bit stressful. No pain in the left forefoot this time. My weight isn't going down significantly, so I guess the new running muscles are just getting stronger. I even tried purposely lapsing into my old heel-striking technique and it felt very awkward. That's a good sign of progress!
I didn't do any barefoot stuff that day, but like I said I maintained a forefoot strike the whole time. I also concentrated a lot on minimizing the time my feet spent on the ground with each step, which is also one of the subtle key differences between great runners and not so great runners.
Looking forward to tomorrow's group run. I'll keep updating and try to put up some posts with more interesting discussions of barefoot running, primitive running etc.
I ran some 200s, 400s, 800s and strides with one of my star athletes and was able to maintain a forefoot strike the entire time. The things that have been bothering me the most since beginning this attempt to change my form have been a sore left forefoot, sore/fatigued calves and tightness in my upper left hamstring. I still feel the tightness in my hammy, but I think my calves are adapting nicely. I don't really get super DOMS (delayed onset muscle soreness) any more, but it's still a bit stressful. No pain in the left forefoot this time. My weight isn't going down significantly, so I guess the new running muscles are just getting stronger. I even tried purposely lapsing into my old heel-striking technique and it felt very awkward. That's a good sign of progress!
I didn't do any barefoot stuff that day, but like I said I maintained a forefoot strike the whole time. I also concentrated a lot on minimizing the time my feet spent on the ground with each step, which is also one of the subtle key differences between great runners and not so great runners.
Looking forward to tomorrow's group run. I'll keep updating and try to put up some posts with more interesting discussions of barefoot running, primitive running etc.
Wednesday, December 9, 2009
Primitive Running 3 - Worst Idea Ever?
Hey followers. Don't have a lot of time to write, but I want to get some thoughts out there before they leave my head.
During our group track workout on Monday some of us ran a portion of the workout barefoot. I've been doing this for a while now, but not everyone in the group has. Quite a few people decided to try it. Today I ran into one of the barefoot experimenters and she told me it was the worst idea ever and that her calves were super sore. Walking a flight of stairs that normally takes her a few seconds was now requiring minutes. I asked her if she thought it was an injury or just a serious case of delayed onset muscle soreness (DOMS). She said if they're still sore tomorrow she'll consider it an injury. If not, I'm pretty sure it's just DOMS. I've had lots of DOMS myself since starting the forefoot strike/primitive/barefoot running stuff.
I also pulled my calf doing barefoot skipping during the track workout. Had an extensive warmup, but maybe my time off (sickness plus holidays) combined with going for too much on the high-knee skipping did me in. As of Wednesday the calf was well enough for some easy jogging, but still injured. Should I blame barefoot training for this mishap? Yes and no. YES because the injury probably would not have happened if I were doing my normal in-shoe heel strike, but NO because it also probably wouldn't have happened if I had been running barefoot for many years.
Guess I haven't spoken yet about how barefoot running and a forefoot strike are related. Watch this video for a quick primer, then maybe in a later post I'll revisit the subject.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9itkEkcQ8WM
Cheers y'all!
During our group track workout on Monday some of us ran a portion of the workout barefoot. I've been doing this for a while now, but not everyone in the group has. Quite a few people decided to try it. Today I ran into one of the barefoot experimenters and she told me it was the worst idea ever and that her calves were super sore. Walking a flight of stairs that normally takes her a few seconds was now requiring minutes. I asked her if she thought it was an injury or just a serious case of delayed onset muscle soreness (DOMS). She said if they're still sore tomorrow she'll consider it an injury. If not, I'm pretty sure it's just DOMS. I've had lots of DOMS myself since starting the forefoot strike/primitive/barefoot running stuff.
I also pulled my calf doing barefoot skipping during the track workout. Had an extensive warmup, but maybe my time off (sickness plus holidays) combined with going for too much on the high-knee skipping did me in. As of Wednesday the calf was well enough for some easy jogging, but still injured. Should I blame barefoot training for this mishap? Yes and no. YES because the injury probably would not have happened if I were doing my normal in-shoe heel strike, but NO because it also probably wouldn't have happened if I had been running barefoot for many years.
Guess I haven't spoken yet about how barefoot running and a forefoot strike are related. Watch this video for a quick primer, then maybe in a later post I'll revisit the subject.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9itkEkcQ8WM
Cheers y'all!
Monday, November 23, 2009
Primitive Running 2 - Coach Rick is Massive
As I mentioned in Part 1, this is not a comprehensive review of running biomechanics. If that is what you're looking for here are a few resources, which I may or may not have looked at myself:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eoUoyBCB1Kg
http://www.active.com/running/Articles/Check_your_form__Running_with_correct_biomechanics.htm
http://www.bobbymcgee.com/products.html
http://www.sportsci.org/jour/0103/mw.htm
Running: Biomechanics and Exercise Physiology in Practice (Hardcover)~ Frans Bosch (Author), Ronald Klomp (Author)
So this begs the question, "is there a difference between what I call "primitive running" and just plain old good running technique?" Hmmmm... I think this will be the topic of a later post.
What I want to concentrate on now is outlining my specific goals for transforming my running and talk about the problems I expect to encounter or have already encountered during my transformation.
If you watched the Dave Scott video listed above you'll see that the last two items listed under "Biomechanics Head to Toe" were 1) AVOID HEEL STRIKE and 2) FOOT LANDS ALIGNED WITH CHEST. These two items are my personal focus for this blog either until I'm done writing or until I have an experience that forces me to realize there is something more worthwhile to talk about. I want to change myself from an over striding heel striker to a properly striding forefoot striker. Here is the difference, slightly exaggerated for effect:
I'm the guy on the left. I want to become the guy on the right. If you take a look at the resources listed above the guy on the right is supposedly the better runner. With a forefoot strike less impact force is transferred to the knee joint and less forward momentum is lost during the deceleration phase of the running motion. So I need to stop landing on my heel and start landing on my forefoot with every running step that I take.
My problem is that I am massive. As of yesterday I was 6 ft tall, 208 lbs. If you subscribe to the logic of the Body Mass Index (BMI) I'm overweight and nearly obese (my BMI is 28.2... see http://www.nhlbisupport.com/bmi/ to calculate yours). In the world of distance runners and triathletes I'm a super heavyweight. Some call us Clydesdales. This mass is a problem because it makes landing on my forefoot an extreme challenge for my calf muscles, my arches and for the forefoot itself. In my attempts to run in this style I've experienced significant pain in my left forefoot and healthy doses of fatigue and soreness in my calf muscles, both during and after the run.
So I should just go back to my old way of running, right? At one point in my life it got me to a 31 minute 8k and I've never had any serious injuries. Many people with heel strikes do get injured, but I never did... so why bother to change? Well, curiosity I guess. At this point I'm convinced that running with a forefoot strike planting under my center of mass will make me a faster, more efficient runner if I work at it. And that is the key... WORK.
I expect this to take time. For the pain in my feet and calves to subside I will have to make them stronger. And it will help if I lose some weight. If I shoot for 10% body fat I would weigh in at about 185 lbs. Still pretty heavy for a distance athlete, but better. And with stronger calves and arches it should get me where I want to be.
And how long will this take? I'm guessing about a year. Yes, I'm looking at a full year of diminished running times and growing pains in hopes that the long-term payoff will be worth it. And so far I have seen some progress.
I started toying with the idea of changing my running form in July of 2009 after attending a USA Triathlon coaching clinic at which Olympic running coach Bobby McGee presented technique tips similar to those I've mentioned in this blog. Since then I've been experimenting with things like stride rate (number of times your foot hits the ground in a certain amount of time), position of foot strike relative to my body's center of mass, pelvic tilt and forward torso lean. Here is a simple outline of my experiences to date:
July through September 2009 - focused more on stride rate, torso lean and location of foot strike than on forcing a forefoot landing. It was easier to do short, high speed intervals at higher speeds, but maintaining posture and pace for longer periods was difficult. Lower back and hamstrings felt strained, but not injured.
September through November 2009 - began forcing a forefoot strike. Could only run for about 15 minutes before my forefoot, arches and calves screamed for mercy. Lots of delayed onset muscle soreness in the calves. It was at the beginning of this phase that I started to realize my weight might be seriously inhibiting me.
November 2009 through December 2009 - still forcing a forefoot strike. I can now run about 45 minutes with a forefoot strike before pain in my feet and calves becomes significant. Definitely making progress. Body weight is still above 200 lbs but arches, calves and hamstrings feel much stronger.
So to recap, I began my transformation in July of 2009. Running was generally difficult under the new style, but is getting much easier. I expect it to a year for this to feel natural. My specific near term goals are to strengthen my calves and arches by forcing a forefoot strike and spending plenty of time in the weight room, and to lose weight to reduce the demand on my muscular and skeletal system. I'll measure progress by comparing my running results from this coming season to my existing PRs, as well as a more subjective analysis of how things feel when I'm running.
My next several posts will consist of summaries of my running workouts with random thoughts added in. Expect further discussions of biomechanics, barefoot running, mental aspects of running, and more!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eoUoyBCB1Kg
http://www.active.com/running/Articles/Check_your_form__Running_with_correct_biomechanics.htm
http://www.bobbymcgee.com/products.html
http://www.sportsci.org/jour/0103/mw.htm
Running: Biomechanics and Exercise Physiology in Practice (Hardcover)~ Frans Bosch (Author), Ronald Klomp (Author)
So this begs the question, "is there a difference between what I call "primitive running" and just plain old good running technique?" Hmmmm... I think this will be the topic of a later post.
What I want to concentrate on now is outlining my specific goals for transforming my running and talk about the problems I expect to encounter or have already encountered during my transformation.
If you watched the Dave Scott video listed above you'll see that the last two items listed under "Biomechanics Head to Toe" were 1) AVOID HEEL STRIKE and 2) FOOT LANDS ALIGNED WITH CHEST. These two items are my personal focus for this blog either until I'm done writing or until I have an experience that forces me to realize there is something more worthwhile to talk about. I want to change myself from an over striding heel striker to a properly striding forefoot striker. Here is the difference, slightly exaggerated for effect:
I'm the guy on the left. I want to become the guy on the right. If you take a look at the resources listed above the guy on the right is supposedly the better runner. With a forefoot strike less impact force is transferred to the knee joint and less forward momentum is lost during the deceleration phase of the running motion. So I need to stop landing on my heel and start landing on my forefoot with every running step that I take.
My problem is that I am massive. As of yesterday I was 6 ft tall, 208 lbs. If you subscribe to the logic of the Body Mass Index (BMI) I'm overweight and nearly obese (my BMI is 28.2... see http://www.nhlbisupport.com/bmi/ to calculate yours). In the world of distance runners and triathletes I'm a super heavyweight. Some call us Clydesdales. This mass is a problem because it makes landing on my forefoot an extreme challenge for my calf muscles, my arches and for the forefoot itself. In my attempts to run in this style I've experienced significant pain in my left forefoot and healthy doses of fatigue and soreness in my calf muscles, both during and after the run.
So I should just go back to my old way of running, right? At one point in my life it got me to a 31 minute 8k and I've never had any serious injuries. Many people with heel strikes do get injured, but I never did... so why bother to change? Well, curiosity I guess. At this point I'm convinced that running with a forefoot strike planting under my center of mass will make me a faster, more efficient runner if I work at it. And that is the key... WORK.
I expect this to take time. For the pain in my feet and calves to subside I will have to make them stronger. And it will help if I lose some weight. If I shoot for 10% body fat I would weigh in at about 185 lbs. Still pretty heavy for a distance athlete, but better. And with stronger calves and arches it should get me where I want to be.
And how long will this take? I'm guessing about a year. Yes, I'm looking at a full year of diminished running times and growing pains in hopes that the long-term payoff will be worth it. And so far I have seen some progress.
I started toying with the idea of changing my running form in July of 2009 after attending a USA Triathlon coaching clinic at which Olympic running coach Bobby McGee presented technique tips similar to those I've mentioned in this blog. Since then I've been experimenting with things like stride rate (number of times your foot hits the ground in a certain amount of time), position of foot strike relative to my body's center of mass, pelvic tilt and forward torso lean. Here is a simple outline of my experiences to date:
July through September 2009 - focused more on stride rate, torso lean and location of foot strike than on forcing a forefoot landing. It was easier to do short, high speed intervals at higher speeds, but maintaining posture and pace for longer periods was difficult. Lower back and hamstrings felt strained, but not injured.
September through November 2009 - began forcing a forefoot strike. Could only run for about 15 minutes before my forefoot, arches and calves screamed for mercy. Lots of delayed onset muscle soreness in the calves. It was at the beginning of this phase that I started to realize my weight might be seriously inhibiting me.
November 2009 through December 2009 - still forcing a forefoot strike. I can now run about 45 minutes with a forefoot strike before pain in my feet and calves becomes significant. Definitely making progress. Body weight is still above 200 lbs but arches, calves and hamstrings feel much stronger.
So to recap, I began my transformation in July of 2009. Running was generally difficult under the new style, but is getting much easier. I expect it to a year for this to feel natural. My specific near term goals are to strengthen my calves and arches by forcing a forefoot strike and spending plenty of time in the weight room, and to lose weight to reduce the demand on my muscular and skeletal system. I'll measure progress by comparing my running results from this coming season to my existing PRs, as well as a more subjective analysis of how things feel when I'm running.
My next several posts will consist of summaries of my running workouts with random thoughts added in. Expect further discussions of biomechanics, barefoot running, mental aspects of running, and more!
Tuesday, November 17, 2009
Transforming myself into a primitive runner
Hey. How's it going? Thanks for checking out my blog. I bet you hope this will be interesting. Me too. Here goes...
This post is the first installment of the still developing story of how I'm transforming myself into a primitive runner. I know what you're thinking... "what is primitive running? Why should I continue reading? Who is this blogger? Why does his grammar suck?". I'll answer in reverse order: I don't write much other than technical reports; I am Rick Vendlinski, triathlon coach; you are curious about endurance sports; it is running using the technique we were naturally built to use.
The next thing you might be thinking... "why is Rick writing about this topic"? We'll I just finished reading Born to Run by Christopher McDougall and I have to say I'm inspired. If you haven't read it here is a synopsis (no spoilers): Man learns about tribe of native Mexican super runners, confirms their existence, provides background on their impact on modern ultra-running and provides review of running biomechanics across various cultures. In addition to an interesting non-fiction adventure story, the book presents an argument that humans were, well, born to run, but that most modern runners do not run as efficiently as our hunter-gatherer predecessors.
This is not a new idea. Born to Run is not the first book to make this argument. And certainly I am not an innovator in the field running biomechanics. However, I do believe I can offer some perspective to the debate (more on my unique perspective later).
To clarify, the topic being debated has two opposing sides which extol the following two viewpoints:
1) Humans were designed to be great runners and naturally have perfect running form. The use of modern footwear inhibits this perfect form and creates slower, more frequently injured runners.
2) Every human has their own unique running style that feels comfortable to them and straying from that individual running style can lead to injury and poor running efficiency. Modern footwear enhances the running experience and improves race times.
The scope of science and speculation surrounding this topic is huge, and I don't want to present a comprehensive review. What I do want to do is:
1) Tell you which side of the debate I believe in now.
2) Briefly and occasionally explain why I believe it.
3) Explain specifically how I am trying to transform my running.
4) Tell you if it is working.
5) Tell you which side of the debate I believe when my experiment is over.
6) Explain how my experience is relevant to whom I'll call "Regular Jo" (Jo is short for Joseph or Joann, whichever you prefer).
Regular Jo is a person who has little to no experience with competitive running, is not super-fit, and has no desire to dominate the world of endurance sports. Prior to about 2001 I was Regular Jo. In most ways I am still Regular Jo, though I have accumulated some race experience in the past few years. I like to coach Regular Jos because I can relate to them. I've faced the challenges they face. I hope this experiment will provide some insight that will make endurance running more accessible to them.
I'll get down to business in my next post. Regular Jos standby.
This post is the first installment of the still developing story of how I'm transforming myself into a primitive runner. I know what you're thinking... "what is primitive running? Why should I continue reading? Who is this blogger? Why does his grammar suck?". I'll answer in reverse order: I don't write much other than technical reports; I am Rick Vendlinski, triathlon coach; you are curious about endurance sports; it is running using the technique we were naturally built to use.
The next thing you might be thinking... "why is Rick writing about this topic"? We'll I just finished reading Born to Run by Christopher McDougall and I have to say I'm inspired. If you haven't read it here is a synopsis (no spoilers): Man learns about tribe of native Mexican super runners, confirms their existence, provides background on their impact on modern ultra-running and provides review of running biomechanics across various cultures. In addition to an interesting non-fiction adventure story, the book presents an argument that humans were, well, born to run, but that most modern runners do not run as efficiently as our hunter-gatherer predecessors.
This is not a new idea. Born to Run is not the first book to make this argument. And certainly I am not an innovator in the field running biomechanics. However, I do believe I can offer some perspective to the debate (more on my unique perspective later).
To clarify, the topic being debated has two opposing sides which extol the following two viewpoints:
1) Humans were designed to be great runners and naturally have perfect running form. The use of modern footwear inhibits this perfect form and creates slower, more frequently injured runners.
2) Every human has their own unique running style that feels comfortable to them and straying from that individual running style can lead to injury and poor running efficiency. Modern footwear enhances the running experience and improves race times.
The scope of science and speculation surrounding this topic is huge, and I don't want to present a comprehensive review. What I do want to do is:
1) Tell you which side of the debate I believe in now.
2) Briefly and occasionally explain why I believe it.
3) Explain specifically how I am trying to transform my running.
4) Tell you if it is working.
5) Tell you which side of the debate I believe when my experiment is over.
6) Explain how my experience is relevant to whom I'll call "Regular Jo" (Jo is short for Joseph or Joann, whichever you prefer).
Regular Jo is a person who has little to no experience with competitive running, is not super-fit, and has no desire to dominate the world of endurance sports. Prior to about 2001 I was Regular Jo. In most ways I am still Regular Jo, though I have accumulated some race experience in the past few years. I like to coach Regular Jos because I can relate to them. I've faced the challenges they face. I hope this experiment will provide some insight that will make endurance running more accessible to them.
I'll get down to business in my next post. Regular Jos standby.
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)
